| Pages: [1] |
1. Armor Tanking Viability - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
slypie11 wrote: Actually, the AR and shotty do more damage against armor, although it is slight. So that is the AR, shotty, locus, HMG, SMG, Massdriver, Flaylock, Plasma launcher, and sniper rifle that do more damage to armor. Actually sir ...
- by Zero Avis - at 2013.05.20 00:24:00
|
2. Armor Tanking Viability - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Armor Tanking is a Viable way to play there are a number of benefits for running armor over shields Armor>Shield Pros 1 Higher total HP 2 Ability to fit damage mods with out HP loss 3 Reduced damaged from majority of the most used weapons (...
- by Zero Avis - at 2013.05.19 19:19:00
|
3. Remove WP Requirement for EVE Bombardments - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Rhorian Darkstar wrote: why not make were eve pilots earn something for there support, to make more appealing to eve side player istead of a lose/lose for them. They would earn what ever they get for winning the district
- by Zero Avis - at 2013.05.16 23:00:00
|
4. Remove WP Requirement for EVE Bombardments - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: There needs to be quite a few problems and questions to be answered first such as shooting down eve players. The tears to follow would be amazing Lol. will be great
- by Zero Avis - at 2013.05.16 18:30:00
|
5. Revamp Dropsuit Role Bonuses - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Would be nice but the Amarr/Gallente Logi is kind of backwards Amarr get DU bouns while Gallente get the Injector bouns. DU is Amarr tech after all. Also the range thing for Cal is a bit uneasy
- by Zero Avis - at 2013.05.16 17:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |